![]() That is, misogyny seemed to us to emblematize the problem that representation poses when it creates oppositions between what we perceive and what we endorse. Assuming, then, its existence, we were attracted to misogyny as a question that makes visible certain perhaps intractable antagonisms between texts and their readers, as well as between texts and the persons who become the objects of their representations. The past twenty-five years of feminist research and criticism have already provided ample evidence of the existence-and persistence-of misogyny and attempts to escape from it. Certainly we did not imagine that the essays collected herein would discover misogyny. Introduction ― vii ― Our choice of misogyny (along with misandry and misanthropy) as the organizing topic for this collection, which originally appeared as a special issue of Representations, calls for some explanation. Oxford © 1989 The Regents of the University of California. ![]() ![]() Howard Bloch and Frances Ferguson UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Misogyny, Misandry, and Misanthropy Edited and with a New Introduction by R. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1989 1989. Howard, and Frances Ferguson, editors Misogyny, Misandry, and Misanthropy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |